What Is The Difference Between Classical Encryption And Post-quantum Encryption?

Estimated read time 3 min read

In our increasingly interconnected digital world, protecting sensitive information is paramount. Encryption serves as the bedrock of modern cybersecurity, safeguarding data from prying eyes and ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of digital communications. Classical encryption algorithms like AES, DES, and RSA have been the go-to tools for securing data for decades. However, with the dawn of quantum computing on the horizon, the robustness of classical encryption faces a formidable challenge.

What are the main differences between these two encryptions?

Classical and post-quantum encryption differ significantly in their underlying principles, resilience against quantum attacks, mathematical foundations, key sizes and performance, standardization and adoption, and quantum-safe security.

Classical encryption algorithms, such as AES and RSA, are based on computational complexity assumptions that are secure against traditional computers. However, they are vulnerable to attacks from quantum computers, which can efficiently solve mathematical problems like prime factorization and discrete logarithms.

In contrast, post-quantum encryption algorithms are designed to withstand attacks from quantum computers by utilizing mathematical problems believed to be computationally hard, even for quantum machines. They include lattice-based cryptography, code-based cryptography, multivariate cryptography, and hash-based cryptography.

Classical encryption typically employs smaller key sizes for efficient encryption and decryption, optimized for performance on classical computing platforms. Post-quantum encryption often requires larger key sizes.

integrating post-quantum encryption

What are the cons of classical and post-quantum encryption?

Both classical encryption and post-quantum encryption have their respective drawbacks and challenges.

Cons of Classical Encryption

As it was mentioned, classical encryption algorithms, such as RSA and ECC, are susceptible to attacks from quantum computers.

Besides, classical encryption algorithms often rely on smaller key sizes for efficiency. However, as computational power increases, longer key sizes may be required to maintain an adequate level of security, which can impact performance and storage requirements.

In addition, as computational techniques evolve, vulnerabilities in classical encryption algorithms may be discovered over time. It means that algorithms considered secure today might become compromised in the future, requiring updates and transitions to stronger encryption methods.

Cons of Post-Quantum Encryption

Post-quantum encryption algorithms generally require more computational resources. It can introduce performance overhead, especially in resource-constrained environments or high-speed data processing applications.

Besides, post-quantum encryption is still a rapidly evolving field, and the selection and standardization of suitable algorithms pose challenges. The process requires extensive evaluation, analysis, and consensus within the cryptographic community to ensure robustness and interoperability.

In addition, integrating post-quantum encryption into existing systems, applications, and protocols can be complex. Compatibility issues, migration strategies, and the need to balance backward compatibility with forward security are all factors that need to be carefully considered during adoption.

You May Also Like